go to this link
plot_ly() and ggplotly() functionsplot_geo()DataTableWe will work with the COVID data presented in lecture. Recall the dataset consists of COVID-19 cases and deaths in each US state during the course of the COVID epidemic.
The objective of this lab is to identify how long after cases increased deaths increased, and after cases decreased deaths decreased, and plot data to demonstrate this
## data extracted from New York Times state-level data from NYT Github repository
# https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data
## state-level population information from us_census_data available on GitHub repository:
# https://github.com/COVID19Tracking/associated-data/tree/master/us_census_data
# load COVID state-level data from NYT
cv_states <- as.data.frame(data.table::fread("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nytimes/covid-19-data/master/us-states.csv"))
# load state population data
state_pops <- as.data.frame(data.table::fread("https://raw.githubusercontent.com/COVID19Tracking/associated-data/master/us_census_data/us_census_2018_population_estimates_states.csv"))
state_pops$abb <- state_pops$state
state_pops$state <- state_pops$state_name
state_pops$state_name <- NULL
cv_states <- merge(cv_states, state_pops, by="state")
head, and tail of the datadim(cv_states)
## [1] 12542 9
head(cv_states)
## state date fips cases deaths geo_id population pop_density abb
## 1 Alabama 2020-08-26 1 119254 2045 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 2 Alabama 2020-09-08 1 133606 2277 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 3 Alabama 2020-07-31 1 87723 1580 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 4 Alabama 2020-07-16 1 61088 1230 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 5 Alabama 2020-05-25 1 14986 566 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 6 Alabama 2020-08-25 1 117242 2037 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
tail(cv_states)
## state date fips cases deaths geo_id population pop_density abb
## 12537 Wyoming 2020-05-27 56 860 14 56 577737 5.950611 WY
## 12538 Wyoming 2020-09-10 56 4199 42 56 577737 5.950611 WY
## 12539 Wyoming 2020-07-18 56 2108 24 56 577737 5.950611 WY
## 12540 Wyoming 2020-08-12 56 3086 29 56 577737 5.950611 WY
## 12541 Wyoming 2020-09-09 56 4151 42 56 577737 5.950611 WY
## 12542 Wyoming 2020-06-10 56 980 18 56 577737 5.950611 WY
str(cv_states)
## 'data.frame': 12542 obs. of 9 variables:
## $ state : chr "Alabama" "Alabama" "Alabama" "Alabama" ...
## $ date : chr "2020-08-26" "2020-09-08" "2020-07-31" "2020-07-16" ...
## $ fips : int 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ cases : int 119254 133606 87723 61088 14986 117242 132973 14149 10164 105557 ...
## $ deaths : int 2045 2277 1580 1230 566 2037 2276 549 403 1890 ...
## $ geo_id : int 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ population : int 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 ...
## $ pop_density: num 96.5 96.5 96.5 96.5 96.5 ...
## $ abb : chr "AL" "AL" "AL" "AL" ...
# format the date
cv_states$date <- as.Date(cv_states$date, format="%Y-%m-%d")
# format the state and state abbreviation (abb) variables
state_list <- unique(cv_states$state)
cv_states$state <- factor(cv_states$state, levels = state_list)
abb_list <- unique(cv_states$abb)
cv_states$abb <- factor(cv_states$abb, levels = abb_list)
# order the data first by state, second by date
cv_states = cv_states[order(cv_states$state, cv_states$date),]
# Confirm the variables are now correctly formatted
str(cv_states)
## 'data.frame': 12542 obs. of 9 variables:
## $ state : Factor w/ 52 levels "Alabama","Alaska",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ date : Date, format: "2020-03-13" "2020-03-14" ...
## $ fips : int 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ cases : int 6 12 23 29 39 51 78 106 131 157 ...
## $ deaths : int 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...
## $ geo_id : int 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
## $ population : int 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 4887871 ...
## $ pop_density: num 96.5 96.5 96.5 96.5 96.5 ...
## $ abb : Factor w/ 52 levels "AL","AK","AZ",..: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ...
head(cv_states)
## state date fips cases deaths geo_id population pop_density abb
## 183 Alabama 2020-03-13 1 6 0 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 190 Alabama 2020-03-14 1 12 0 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 230 Alabama 2020-03-15 1 23 0 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 133 Alabama 2020-03-16 1 29 0 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 66 Alabama 2020-03-17 1 39 0 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 39 Alabama 2020-03-18 1 51 0 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
tail(cv_states)
## state date fips cases deaths geo_id population pop_density abb
## 12497 Wyoming 2020-10-23 56 10545 68 56 577737 5.950611 WY
## 12389 Wyoming 2020-10-24 56 10805 68 56 577737 5.950611 WY
## 12404 Wyoming 2020-10-25 56 11041 68 56 577737 5.950611 WY
## 12342 Wyoming 2020-10-26 56 11477 77 56 577737 5.950611 WY
## 12461 Wyoming 2020-10-27 56 11806 77 56 577737 5.950611 WY
## 12477 Wyoming 2020-10-28 56 12146 77 56 577737 5.950611 WY
# Inspect the range values for each variable. What is the date range? The range of cases and deaths?
head(cv_states)
## state date fips cases deaths geo_id population pop_density abb
## 183 Alabama 2020-03-13 1 6 0 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 190 Alabama 2020-03-14 1 12 0 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 230 Alabama 2020-03-15 1 23 0 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 133 Alabama 2020-03-16 1 29 0 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 66 Alabama 2020-03-17 1 39 0 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
## 39 Alabama 2020-03-18 1 51 0 1 4887871 96.50939 AL
summary(cv_states)
## state date fips cases
## Washington : 282 Min. :2020-01-21 Min. : 1.00 Min. : 1
## Illinois : 279 1st Qu.:2020-05-01 1st Qu.:16.00 1st Qu.: 3323
## California : 278 Median :2020-06-30 Median :29.00 Median : 20154
## Arizona : 277 Mean :2020-06-29 Mean :29.77 Mean : 66536
## Massachusetts: 271 3rd Qu.:2020-08-29 3rd Qu.:44.00 3rd Qu.: 76971
## Wisconsin : 267 Max. :2020-10-28 Max. :72.00 Max. :931113
## (Other) :10888
## deaths geo_id population pop_density
## Min. : 0 Min. : 1.00 Min. : 577737 Min. : 1.292
## 1st Qu.: 76 1st Qu.:16.00 1st Qu.: 1805832 1st Qu.: 54.956
## Median : 532 Median :29.00 Median : 4468402 Median : 107.860
## Mean : 2291 Mean :29.77 Mean : 6560815 Mean : 420.682
## 3rd Qu.: 2250 3rd Qu.:44.00 3rd Qu.: 7535591 3rd Qu.: 229.511
## Max. :33107 Max. :72.00 Max. :39557045 Max. :11490.120
## NA's :230
## abb
## WA : 282
## IL : 279
## CA : 278
## AZ : 277
## MA : 271
## WI : 267
## (Other):10888
min(cv_states$date)
## [1] "2020-01-21"
max(cv_states$date)
## [1] "2020-10-28"
new_cases and new_deaths and correct outliersnew_cases, and new deaths, new_deaths:
new_cases is equal to the difference between cases on date i and date i-1, starting on date i=2Use plotly for EDA: See if there are outliers or values that don’t make sense for new_cases and new_deaths. Which states and which dates have strange values?
Correct outliers: Set negative values for new_cases or new_deaths to 0
Recalculate cases and deaths as cumulative sum of updates new_cases and new_deaths
# Add variables for new_cases and new_deaths:
for (i in 1:length(state_list)) {
cv_subset = subset(cv_states, state == state_list[i])
cv_subset = cv_subset[order(cv_subset$date),]
# add starting level for new cases and deaths
cv_subset$new_cases = cv_subset$cases[1]
cv_subset$new_deaths = cv_subset$deaths[1]
for (j in 2:nrow(cv_subset)) {
cv_subset$new_cases[j] = cv_subset$cases[j] - cv_subset$cases[j-1]
cv_subset$new_deaths[j] = cv_subset$deaths[j] - cv_subset$deaths[j-1]
}
# include in main dataset
cv_states$new_cases[cv_states$state==state_list[i]] = cv_subset$new_cases
cv_states$new_deaths[cv_states$state==state_list[i]] = cv_subset$new_deaths
}
# Inspect outliers using plotly
p1<-ggplot(cv_states, aes(x = date, y = new_cases, color = state)) + geom_line() + geom_point(size = .5, alpha = 0.5)
ggplotly(p1)
p1<-NULL # to clear from workspace
p2<-ggplot(cv_states, aes(x = date, y = new_deaths, color = state)) + geom_line() + geom_point(size = .5, alpha = 0.5)
ggplotly(p2)
p2<-NULL # to clear from workspace
# set negative new case or death counts to 0
cv_states$new_cases[cv_states$new_cases<0] = 0
cv_states$new_deaths[cv_states$new_deaths<0] = 0
# Recalculate `cases` and `deaths` as cumulative sum of updates `new_cases` and `new_deaths`
for (i in 1:length(state_list)) {
cv_subset = subset(cv_states, state == state_list[i])
# add starting level for new cases and deaths
cv_subset$cases = cv_subset$cases[1]
cv_subset$deaths = cv_subset$deaths[1]
for (j in 2:nrow(cv_subset)) {
cv_subset$cases[j] = cv_subset$new_cases[j] + cv_subset$cases[j-1]
cv_subset$deaths[j] = cv_subset$new_deaths[j] + cv_subset$deaths[j-1]
}
# include in main dataset
cv_states$cases[cv_states$state==state_list[i]] = cv_subset$cases
cv_states$deaths[cv_states$state==state_list[i]] = cv_subset$deaths
}
numeric). You can use the following variable names:
per100k = cases per 100,000 populationnewper100k= new cases per 100,000deathsper100k = deaths per 100,000newdeathsper100k = new deaths per 100,000Add a “naive CFR” variable representing deaths / cases on each date for each state
Create a dataframe representing values on the most recent date, cv_states_today, as done in lecture
# add population normalized (by 100,000) counts for each variable
cv_states$per100k = as.numeric(format(round(cv_states$cases/(cv_states$population/100000),1),nsmall=1))
cv_states$newper100k = as.numeric(format(round(cv_states$new_cases/(cv_states$population/100000),1),nsmall=1))
cv_states$deathsper100k = as.numeric(format(round(cv_states$deaths/(cv_states$population/100000),1),nsmall=1))
cv_states$newdeathsper100k = as.numeric(format(round(cv_states$new_deaths/(cv_states$population/100000),1),nsmall=1))
# add a naive_CFR variable = deaths / cases
cv_states = cv_states %>% mutate(naive_CFR = round((deaths*100/cases),2))
# create a `cv_states_today` variable
cv_states_today = subset(cv_states, date==max(cv_states$date))
plot_ly()plot_ly() representing pop_density vs. various variables (e.g. cases, per100k, deaths, deathsper100k) for each state on most recent date (cv_states_today)
hovermode = "compare"# pop_density vs. cases
cv_states_today %>%
plot_ly(x = ~pop_density, y = ~cases,
type = 'scatter', mode = 'markers', color = ~state,
size = ~population, sizes = c(5, 70), marker = list(sizemode='diameter', opacity=0.5))
# filter out "District of Columbia"
cv_states_today_scatter <- cv_states_today %>% filter(state!="District of Columbia")
# pop_density vs. cases after filtering
cv_states_today_scatter %>% filter(state!="District of Columbia") %>%
plot_ly(x = ~pop_density, y = ~cases,
type = 'scatter', mode = 'markers', color = ~state,
size = ~population, sizes = c(5, 70), marker = list(sizemode='diameter', opacity=0.5))
# pop_density vs. deathsper100k
cv_states_today_scatter %>% filter(state!="District of Columbia") %>%
plot_ly(x = ~pop_density, y = ~deathsper100k, z = ~population,
type = 'scatter', mode = 'markers', color = ~state,
size = ~population, sizes = c(5, 70), marker = list(sizemode='diameter', opacity=0.5))
# Adding hoverinfo
cv_states_today_scatter %>%
plot_ly(x = ~pop_density, y = ~deathsper100k,
type = 'scatter', mode = 'markers', color = ~state,
size = ~population, sizes = c(5, 70), marker = list(sizemode='diameter', opacity=0.5),
hoverinfo = 'text',
text = ~paste( paste(state, ":", sep=""), paste(" Cases per 100k: ", per100k, sep="") , paste(" Deaths per 100k: ",
deathsper100k, sep=""), sep = "<br>")) %>%
layout(title = "Population-normalized COVID-19 deaths (per 100k) vs. population density for US states",
yaxis = list(title = "Deaths per 100k"), xaxis = list(title = "Population Density"),
hovermode = "compare")
ggplotly() and geom_smooth()pop_density vs. newdeathsper100k create a chart with the same variables using gglot_ly()geom_smooth()
pop_density is a correlate of newdeathsper100k?p <- ggplot(cv_states_today_scatter, aes(x=pop_density, y=deathsper100k, size=population)) + geom_point() + geom_smooth()
ggplotly(p)
naive_CFR for all states over time using plot_ly()
naive_CFR for the states that had a “first peak” in September. How have they changed over time?new_cases and new_deaths together in one plot. Hint: use add_layer()
# Line chart for naive_CFR for all states over time using `plot_ly()`
plot_ly(cv_states, x = ~date, y = ~naive_CFR, color = ~state, type = "scatter", mode = "lines")
# Line chart for Texas showing new_cases and new_deaths together
cv_states %>% filter(state=="Texas") %>% plot_ly(x = ~date, y = ~new_cases, type = "scatter", mode = "lines") %>% add_lines(x = ~date, y = ~new_deaths, type = "scatter", mode = "lines")
Create a heatmap to visualize new_cases for each state on each date greater than April 1st, 2020 - Start by mapping selected features in the dataframe into a matrix using the tidyr package function pivot_wider(), naming the rows and columns, as done in the lecture notes - Use plot_ly() to create a heatmap out of this matrix - Create a second heatmap in which the pattern of new_cases for each state over time becomes more clear by filtering to only look at dates every two weeks
# Map state, date, and new_cases to a matrix
library(tidyr)
cv_states_mat <- cv_states %>% select(state, date, new_cases) %>% filter(date>as.Date("2020-04-01"))
cv_states_mat2 <- as.data.frame(pivot_wider(cv_states_mat, names_from = state, values_from = new_cases))
rownames(cv_states_mat2) <- cv_states_mat2$date
cv_states_mat2$date <- NULL
cv_states_mat2 <- as.matrix(cv_states_mat2)
# Create a heatmap using plot_ly()
plot_ly(x=colnames(cv_states_mat2), y=rownames(cv_states_mat2),
z=~cv_states_mat2,
type="heatmap",
showscale=T)
# Create a second heatmap after filtering to only include dates every other week
filter_dates <- seq(as.Date("2020-04-01"), as.Date("2020-10-01"), by="2 weeks")
cv_states_mat <- cv_states %>% select(state, date, new_cases) %>% filter(date %in% filter_dates)
cv_states_mat2 <- as.data.frame(pivot_wider(cv_states_mat, names_from = state, values_from = new_cases))
rownames(cv_states_mat2) <- cv_states_mat2$date
cv_states_mat2$date <- NULL
cv_states_mat2 <- as.matrix(cv_states_mat2)
# Create a heatmap using plot_ly()
plot_ly(x=colnames(cv_states_mat2), y=rownames(cv_states_mat2),
z=~cv_states_mat2,
type="heatmap",
showscale=T)
naive_CFR by state on May 1st, 2020naive_CFR by state on most recent datesubplot(). Make sure the shading is for the same range of values (google is your friend for this)### For May 1 2020
# Extract the data for each state by its abbreviation
cv_CFR <- cv_states %>% filter(date=="2020-05-01") %>% select(state, abb, naive_CFR, cases, deaths) # select data
cv_CFR$state_name <- cv_CFR$state
cv_CFR$state <- cv_CFR$abb
cv_CFR$abb <- NULL
# Create hover text
cv_CFR$hover <- with(cv_CFR, paste(state_name, '<br>', "CFR: ", naive_CFR, '<br>', "Cases: ", cases, '<br>', "Deaths: ", deaths))
# Set up mapping details
set_map_details <- list(
scope = 'usa',
projection = list(type = 'albers usa'),
showlakes = TRUE,
lakecolor = toRGB('white')
)
# Make sure both maps are on the same color scale
shadeLimit <- 9
# Create the map
fig <- plot_geo(cv_CFR, locationmode = 'USA-states') %>%
add_trace(
z = ~naive_CFR, text = ~hover, locations = ~state,
color = ~naive_CFR, colors = 'Purples'
)
fig <- fig %>% colorbar(title = "CFR May 1 2020", limits = c(0,shadeLimit))
fig <- fig %>% layout(
title = paste('CFR by State as of', Sys.Date(), '<br>(Hover for value)'),
geo = set_map_details
)
fig_May1 <- fig
#############
### For Today
# Extract the data for each state by its abbreviation
cv_CFR <- cv_states_today %>% select(state, abb, naive_CFR, cases, deaths) # select data
cv_CFR$state_name <- cv_CFR$state
cv_CFR$state <- cv_CFR$abb
cv_CFR$abb <- NULL
# Create hover text
cv_CFR$hover <- with(cv_CFR, paste(state_name, '<br>', "CFR: ", naive_CFR, '<br>', "Cases: ", cases, '<br>', "Deaths: ", deaths))
# Set up mapping details
set_map_details <- list(
scope = 'usa',
projection = list(type = 'albers usa'),
showlakes = TRUE,
lakecolor = toRGB('white')
)
# Create the map
fig <- plot_geo(cv_CFR, locationmode = 'USA-states') %>%
add_trace(
z = ~naive_CFR, text = ~hover, locations = ~state,
color = ~naive_CFR, colors = 'Purples'
)
fig <- fig %>% colorbar(title = "CFR May 1 2020", limits = c(0,shadeLimit))
fig <- fig %>% layout(
title = paste('CFR by State as of', Sys.Date(), '<br>(Hover for value)'),
geo = set_map_details
)
fig_Today <- fig
### Plot together
subplot(fig_May1, fig_Today)